Originally Posted by
shiznit
Vacation per pilot at DAL is roughly 4 weeks/year. Increase it by :15.
10,500 x :15 x 28 = 73,500 hours
DAL Pilots spend approx 6 days per year at training. Increase it by :30.
10,500 x :30 x 6 = 31,500 hours
73,500 + 31,500 = 105,000 / 12 months = 8,750 hours
8750 / 87* hours = 100.57 = 101 MORE pilots needed for just those 2 provisions.
72 hours is the projected gain from the staffing formula changes.
So between staffing formula and vaca/trng pay increases we have wiped out well over half of what they are claiming in savings from the 300 number....
Don't forget that you are still full once you hit ALV, and no longer will all reserves be forced to fly up to the lineholder ALV... A reserve will be full at their individually calculated ALV..... Combine that with the increased values for VAC/TRNG and a reserve ALV will often be lower than the normal ALV for 5-6 months per year.
*The 87 is the official ALPA distributed number... using a lower divisor of 75:00 means it would be 117 pilots needed.
This is an extremely complex set of changes and getting hung up on a small piece of it is not good. It still might not stack up to what we want as a group, but make sure we evaluate it in its entirety and in light of the reality of our peers and the RLA/NMB. Still can't be sure I'm voting yes, its a daily swing for me too.
At least we can agree on the bolded part above. Historically, complex formulas, ratios and such have not panned out well for this pilot group.
When things don't work out all we get is "sorry" (if that). We should not be offering ALV + 15, more permanent large RJ's replacing small inefficient RJ's that will go away on their own, or any other work rule concessions to fix managements problems.
What is being offered is not even close to what this contract should be and the wrong direction in my opinion. There is no going back if it is passed. The damage, stagnation, and frustration will be permanent.