Originally Posted by
slowplay
You understand that what management opened for wasn't a new airframe type. What they opened for was to change the seat count on their existing fleet to 80/82 seats (older CRJ-900 can only handle 80, newer ones 82).
There was never a proposal that includes the airframes that you suggest.
And that would still be dangerous IMO, as it opens the door for a 100 seat airframe configured with a 2 class 80+ seat cabin. Good job saying no to that one.