Originally Posted by
johnso29
slowplay,
Does the TA require them to maintain 125 50 seaters? Or are they just capped?
Well, they'd be under contract and if you can get rid of them then without a swap for larger aircraft, why not now?
Speaking of which, what is the penalty cost for parking CR2s before the contracts are up?
Because 1. if the cost to park CR2s is high for the company and we're bailing them out with the swap, are we being compensated properly for it?
2. If the cost is low, then why sign off on this CR9 swap for unwanted CR2s in the first place? Why not just do that now and not give up more 76 seaters?