Originally Posted by
Bill Lumberg
With oil possible that low, we want guarantees that the 50 seat numbers will go LOWER. Also, lower oil would mean more profits potentially, meaning more profit sharing potential. That supposed cut of 5% from 15% to 10% under 2.5 billion wouldn't even be a player if profits climbed north of $2.5 billion. Hello 20% profit sharing!
Very nice spin job Bill. But if we are getting 15% of up to $2.5B, and with the TA, we get 10% of up to $2.5B, thats a 33%
CUT in profit sharing as I'm sure you know but refuse to believe it.
And besides, wasn't one of the things the NC stated was that pilots wanted "guaranteed money"? With oil that low, dont you think we should try to renegotiate?
Probably not..............