Originally Posted by
slowplay
If donating to their cause requires management to upsize mainline compared to DCI, raise our salaries by $420 million in the last year, shrink DCI by 25% in airframes and 16% in seats, enhances international scope and JV protections, raises vacation by 8%, raises reserve guarantee by an average 8%, etc. then I'm all for that IRS code.
Of course we can take your failed anti-drug strategy (just say no) and do what has been so successful for APA, UAL/CAL, PCL, ASA/XJT, etc.
Your notion is that I'm saying no just to say no. I am saying no because this TA is hideous.
Originally Posted by
slowplay
Yup, we can do that.
How'd SWA get where they are? And SWA, UPS or FedEx, whose companies have had sustained profitability and no bankruptcy ever reached the payrates that we achieved 8 years ago?
How'd they do it? Good to excellent scope.
No whipsaw.