Originally Posted by
gloopy
Anyone with an ounce of leadership in them would say the same thing. And most of the time most of the guys would probably be cool with it. But what about some lackey that wants to throw you under the bus (the "just following orders" types)? What are you expected to do, go get a note saying that you are mentally unfit to fly? So now you have a documented mental condition? Have fun with that on your next medical.
The new sick policy has some very scarry potential consequences with really zero gains. What difference does it make if you raise the threshold of harassment if you then include a catch all blank check for harassment?
See my previous post.
I enjoy a spirited debate, and I recognize that your perspective may be different than mine. I do find it hard to believe that you consider the examples I posted above as "really zero gains."
If your agenda is to blow this TA out of the water no matter what, then fine. I respect your conviction. However, you lose credibility when you post incorrect information. This comes from someone who has learned quite a bit from your posts - especially regarding scope.
If your aim is to have a factual discussion of the merits/downsides of the TA then we have to deal in facts.