Originally Posted by
tsquare
I want to see his proof of his $2-$2.5 billion cost to re-engine and maintain the 50s.. not more third hand blather. It does seem to me that that figure would define the term "total" as in what it would do to your car if you wrecked it and ran up a certain bill. Naaaah I think this is more propaganda BS.
BS..Maybe...then maybe not.
2.5B or maybe its 1.5B. Would that change your mind about whether leverage on the company exists?
You want proof? Perform some due diligence and vet his information out. The most informed vote is the best vote.
If you're so skepitcal Then what's your hypothesis as to why mgmt is SO eager for a TA? Oh..your answer should be related to dollars and not some hypothetical "position us to better compete" fluff. Mgmt lives in a concrete world.