Originally Posted by
FIIGMO
We will pay for any improvements in another TA, we may get 5% more but we will give it up somewhere else. It is a negotiation.
That's NOT what negotiations mean FIIGMO!!!
Look man, you know I love ya, but please think about this. We'd all be working for the exact same conditions and pay from 1930 if this was the case. A cost neutral negotiations is appropriate when the company is in trouble. It is NOT appropriate when the company is making billions.
DALPA/management have done an incredible job of getting our newer people to believe that negotiations is defined as paying for any gains with losses in other areas.
Sigh...
Carl