Originally Posted by
georgetg
I'd say no matter where you stand on the TA, it's a matter of placing value on things.
In my opinion my fellow Delta pilots are a fine bunch of aviators.
Sharp, intelligent the majority are even funny.
I wouldn't want to be associated with a finer bunch of people.
And yet you'll find division in the ranks.
Slam click or stay out late.
Water beer or wine.
Navy, Air Force or god forbid civilian.
Where some see a big reduction in DCI,
other see an increase in large RJs.
Where some see a gain from the speedier retirement of the 50-seater,
other see a tired unwanted jet that was due to go away on its own.
Where some see the benefit of making Delta's DCI operation more profitable,
other see a lifeline thrown to an industry segment in decline.
Where some see the pilot positions gained by introducing a new fleet type,
other lament the loss of pilot positions by work rule changes.
Where some see their captain seat finally arriving,
other see a downward shift in pay and career expectations.
Where some see industry leading pay-rates,
other see pay parity with our peers current pay reached years from now.
Where some see the ratios as ensuring flying will transfer from DCI to mainline,
other say not so fast only if DCI doesn't shrink and then just a little.
Where some see a gain in protection for future JV agreements,
other see a lower negotiating floor.
Where some see a gain for reserves,
others see a concession.
Depending on your perspective, you'll find your truth somewhere between all of that...
Apart from a select few "extremists", I haven't spoken with many that unequivocally value the TA as good or bad.
Cheers
George
George,
Without getting into some of the emotion that has boiled over with this TA (at least on this forum) this is the best, simplest explanation of this TA to date. Thanks,
DAL73n