Originally Posted by
More Bacon
So, according to DALPA, this TA is not cost neutral.
That would mean RA, EB, et al are lying by telling Wall Street that it is cost neutral.
I'm pretty sure that would be illegal. Wire fraud, conspiracy, etc. etc.
Someone needs to alert the FBI. And the SEC too, for good measure.
...or maybe it's DALPA who is lying.
If the company saves $100 (or a billion) somewhere on the balance sheet and then gives it to us...it is "cost neutral" to the company, get it?
Despite everything I have read, I refuse to believe you are so obtuse as to not understand the meaning of this; but feel free to keep posting this "cost neutral" nonsense if it helps you rationalize your "no" vote.