Additionally, the $150/wk was applied to limited individuals since it was only for a week that each individual would have had their training slid, which was minimal. The other thing noted was that the argument from the union in the 1999 case was opposite what was being raised this time, and the company used that logic (reasoning?) against the union. The issue of a domicile isn't addressed in balck and white, and the lawyers don't have a case. Finally, I talked to Dave Risch, and he's not the bad guy in this. He looked into the issue and tried to pass along info as best he could, but is not the approving authority, so any fire directed his way is misplaced. Perhaps next contract the issue of domicile can be spelled out, but that will be moot for all of us now.