How about this, it looks as if the company is losing money. That's probably our fault like anything else, we cost a lot of money. I mean this contract now is going to cost the company $1B or something.

How about instead of driving this company into the ground by trying to hit a grand slam 19% raise over 3 years we instead focus on hitting a single?

How about 4% YOY as we have been doing and the company must sunset every DCI contract. By 2022, DCI will be gone. We will take care of Alaska and Republic the next go around?

So how about that? 4% YOY for the next 3 years with sunset clauses? 12% vs 19%, sunset vs significant increase in jumbo RJs?

Oh, and work rules that increase staffing instead of decrease it. That way we can get some movement coupled with retirements so that your pay raises come from moving on up like Weezy. And decrease the PBS staffing formula to be based of 50 hours for reserve pilots instead of 60.

Oh, wait, let me write this as if I was writing a NNP and overuse the word "significant":

Maybe, we should reconsider the raises and just focus on hitting singles in raises and focus on movement instead of significant raises. Like significantly reducing how much is outsourced both to RJs and Alaska, and significantly increasing work rules that facilitate a significant increase in pilots and not a significant decrease in pilots.