Originally Posted by
tsquare
We will be negotiating a new contract in 2015... what's your point?
I was being sarcastic, guess it didn't come across that way even though I used a

. Just stating that the original poster made it seem like this 717 deal is a lot better for the company than ALPA thought. Original poster implied that it will save the company $750 million next year alone. I believe the article is not written well because I have to believe, as stated by shiznit, that the savings must be from the entire refleeting project. There is no way that just 16 airplanes (717's) next year are going to save us that kind of money. My thoughts anyway.