Originally Posted by
Timbo
I guess it depends on how you define 'bigger'.
I see 737's replacing 757's and 767's (Domestic routes)
I see 787's eventually replacing 767ER's (a wash, size wise?) but maybe replacing 777's in 10 years, and 747's maybe sooner than that. The last I heard, the 787 is about the size of a 767ER, not the size of a 777 or 747.
I see the 717's as our only 'growth' airplane. Do we call that bigger? It is bigger than a 50 or 76 seat RJ, no doubt, but it's the smallest 'manline' airframe out there.
I don't see that as bigger, just more small narrow body flying with the 737's ((-900) and 717's.
I don't see Bigger coming any time soon, until we order and take delivery of something as big as the 777-300 and 747, I'm not holding my breath waiting for those. In the mean time, we will have pilots displaced off the 767/757 to the 737-900.
Why are so many people forgetting that
almost half of the 737-900's will replace
LOWER PAYING older A320's?
(Also, the 737-900 seats MORE than the 320 and the MD-90 seats MORE than the DC-9.)