Originally Posted by
thecloser2144
My 2 cents....engines are starting to deteriorate for the tanker, so going to the CFM56's isn't possible, nor would it make sense now, with them being over 20 years old in most cases, and I've also heard the AF is running short of them.
When I worked the R models at Fairchild, 93 to 03, the engines were a maintenance dream. 300 hrs on them, on average, when I arrived and 3 to 5000 hrs when I left. The engines were extremely reliable. I only dropped 4 engines during my time there, and those drops were caused by a coating in the 7th, 8th, and 9th stage that would come apart and FOD the engine. The flightline did a couple engine drops due to engine ground strikes. Both engines were put back up on the wing after the strut was inspected and the fan ducts were replaced. I saw several bird strikes and I also was on a post phase engine run that experienced a compressor stall at TRT. (shifted the plane about 6 ft sideways) I never droped an engine due to bird strike or the compressor stall. I felt the compressor stalled engine should have been dropped, but tech data showed the damage that was done to the 9th stage compressor was all within limits.
I talked with a GE tech rep and he said that there is a clip that holds the HPT Clearance Control Shroud that is/was going to 100% fail due to erosion. I have also talked with former co-worker and he said that the engines are definatly showing their age now. Said the Control Shroud is causing high EGT on engine starts.