View Single Post
Old 08-07-2012 | 11:46 PM
  #37  
nbecca
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ATCsaidDoWhat

The initial contract was done under an old leadership of the Airline Division and Local 747 and was a disgrace. That's why Local 747 no longer exists and there is new leadership in the Airline Division. It's also one of the reasons that FAPA is having a cow...because there is leadership that won't let them (FAPA) steamroll the other pilot groups; and when they tried to cut a side deal, they got sued and will probably lose their backsides on it.
I'm sorry to be redundant.

"The initial contract was done under an old leadership of the Airline Division and Local 747 and was a disgrace. That's why Local 747 no longer exists and there is new leadership in the Airline Division."

You don't know what you're talking about. You have the same Negotiating Chair as you did "under an old leadership of the Airline Division and Local 747 and was a disgrace"

You have 2 of the three members on the NC as you did on the SLI and the same Attorney.

"...leadership that won't let them (FAPA) steamroll the other pilot groups..." You don't know what you're talking about. FAPA has tried to steamroll NO ONE. Give me one example, NOT LOA 67 or FAPAInvest.

"...they got sued and will probably lose their backsides on it." I believe I've made myself clear on this. You are repeating incorrect information from an extremely questionable source, You don't know what you're talking about.

That's 0-3 two times in a row. Are you going to be like the Korean Fencer and just sit on your "position" until Security escorts you off the piste in tears?
Reply