Originally Posted by
Nevets
You do realize that XJT has replacement rights?
And you do realize that United SCOPE is unlimited 70 seaters and they still have you guys fly ERJs around, are they waiting to stack up on CRJ 900 or E175 is the question. Just because you have replacement rights don't mean a thing, your company will have to play ball if they wish to continue business past your current contract with United!
What I'm saying is that when the ERJ leases begin to expire, if sCAL wants to replace those with ANY aircraft their scope allows, it must be flown by ERJ pilots.
Originally Posted by
Nevets
You do realize that XJT has replacement rights?
Reading B.3 and B.4 of the TPA, I think it depends on what form the flying takes (an extension of a current CPA or a new CPA) -- Could mgmt. agree to cancel their current CPA with United and sign a new one to fly 70s and place them wherever they wanted? (Not scaremongering, just trying to understand the contract language).
I don't know but I'm sure they will try anything to not treat their pilots with the dignity and respect they preach about if it means they can get cheaper pilots to do the flying. I would guess there might be a little bit of labor strife if they do that.
Originally Posted by
Nevets
You do realize that XJT has replacement rights?
Is SkyWest going to sue itself for replacing those planes and putting them somewhere else within the Inc stable?
No, but the entity they made that agreement with, with clear intent and in good faith might.