View Single Post
Old 08-11-2012 | 01:33 PM
  #107281  
skylover
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by scambo1
Generally, if you have to throw a switch to get a system to perform its job, it is dumbed down (or at least not operating the way the most modern equipment operates). Newer jets do most of the things flight engineers used to do automatically.

The 737 is far from the "dumbest" jet in DALs inventory. However, the overhead panel is mostly manually operated.

There is a benefit from both approaches to jets actually, dumb or smart. It is difficult to transition from the dumbest jets to the smartest jets. It is probably even harder to go from the smartest to the dumbest.

In my case, I am pretty sure I wouldn't choose to fly the DC-9 (our dumbest jet). It would just not be pretty.

In different jets, you prioritize what is important at any given time. In dumb jets, everything is important and needs attention, smart jets tell you what is important freeing the pilot up to concentrate of phase of flight issues.
So I'm guessing the Airbus fleet is more on the "smart" side?

Why did SWA have anything to do with the 737 cockpit being "dumb"?

Now let me just present my opinion, keeping in mind that I am not a pilot yet. When I say I want to be a pilot, I really mean that - I don't want to simply monitor the aircraft computers. I would imagine a pilot flying a DC9, for example, tests one's flying skills more than a pilot flying an A320. (Of course, both pilots have the same skill set to begin with)

Last edited by skylover; 08-11-2012 at 01:44 PM.