Originally Posted by
aa73
The firm that APA hired (Lazard) had one goal: to recommend the least-risk option to the membership, which was a Yes vote. They also would have gotten a lot more $$$ with a Yes vote.
So the APA did a bad job of hiring attorneys then? I don't get it. If they had recommended the course that you have set upon, and you get taken to the woodshed, would you think they have done the correct thing for you? That makes no sense. If you just want a rubber stamp to agree with the anger and encourage you while you commit hari kiri, hell, I'll do that for you for a cool $500,000. Tell me what you want, and I'll go right along with that.