Originally Posted by
tsquare
As to whether or not it constitutes arrogance, I beg to differ. He was merely commenting on what the judge said, and inflecting his opinion based on what happened to us and to the other players that have been thru BK.
Most of the "facts" presented were completely WRONG, making the rest of the argument moot. Very few of his comments were of what anyone SAID, it was mostly speculation on what he thought something meant, things that MAY happen presented as facts, and finishes with telling us how we should accept a C-scale contract that we will be stuck with for 10 years.
Brilliant.
Another point to consider is that is any of his arguments had any merit, it assumes that the pilots of AA completely missed these facts, knew nothing about what happened in other carrier's bankruptcies, and our hired legal council and advisers also are clueless to these irrefutable facts and logic.
Wake up and smell the arrogance.
I don't have time to waste breaking down each bullet point. There were a lot of them, and almost every single one of them was WRONG.