Originally Posted by
Enterprise
Most of the "facts" presented were completely WRONG, making the rest of the argument moot. Very few of his comments were of what anyone SAID, it was mostly speculation on what he thought something meant, things that MAY happen presented as facts, and finishes with telling us how we should accept a C-scale contract that we will be stuck with for 10 years.
Brilliant.
Another point to consider is that is any of his arguments had any merit, it assumes that the pilots of AA completely missed these facts, knew nothing about what happened in other carrier's bankruptcies, and our hired legal council and advisers also are clueless to these irrefutable facts and logic.
Wake up and smell the arrogance.
I don't have time to waste breaking down each bullet point. There were a lot of them, and almost every single one of them was WRONG.
But yet you chose to go against the advice of those same attorneys and vote it down... or did they suggest that you do so? Got a DFR suit ready?
"Brilliant."
Anger is a poor strategy, and when someone says, "I don't have time to..." it is a clear indicator that he has no points to back up his argument.