Originally Posted by
80ktsClamp
Even if we allowed it, they wouldn't be configured to 90 seats.
Really?? Seems that the CRJ-900 is "marketed" and
capable of 90 seats. Stating the obvious, your current PWA/CBA
dictates provisions of "76 seats" which are config'ed by a two class cabin, we get that.
Plain and simple....The CRJ-900 is
capable of 90 seats. Don't believe, you can read more via the link below. Here's some high-lights:
"The CRJ900 is a stretched 76-90 seat version of the CRJ700."
Bombardier CRJ700 series - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
What have we learned here......The "CRJ-900" is "capable" of 90 seats. Will that be Mgt's next bite since the airframes are currently present?? I hope not, we're rooting for you.
Originally Posted by
80ktsClamp
Even the 70 seaters are running around at 65 or so seats so they can have first class.
Correct, with a "Gold Star".
SkyWest CRJ-700's (under UAL Colors) that are in two class config total 66 seats (6/60). COULD these airframes hold "70 seats"?? You betcha!! Just like the CRJ-900 being capable of "90 seats".
Originally Posted by
80ktsClamp
Not that I agreed with allowing more jumbo RJs, but you need to be educated on reality.
"Pot meet Kettle" per your ^^^opening comments^^^ and condescending tone?
