Thread: System Bid Out
View Single Post
Old 09-15-2012 | 06:18 AM
  #164  
untied's Avatar
untied
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 521
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by horrido27

Career expectations can and should come into play.. but there in lies a MAJOR problem. Some mergers bring similar carriers together, some don't.
The argument will be simple- where do we think our two airlines were headed and what does that mean for us.
Our two sides will make their presentations and then it will be up to the Arbitrator.
My side will argue that-
1) We had 149 pilots on the street at the time of the merger, a much lower percentage then you had.
2) That we had firm orders on the books for 737's and 787's. And none of them (at the time) were listed as replacement aircraft.
3) That we had the strongest Scope in the Industry.
4) That our "financials" were strong.

Obviously, your side will argue otherwise.
But in the end, it will go to arbitration.

We will never know what would have happened to our two carriers had we stay independent. But I will always believe that my career expectations were good at a stand alone Continental.
Again, all 12000+ pilots at both carriers will have very different opinions based on their current status, their age and their airline.

We'll have this discussion again in Spring/Summer 2013!

Motch
Career expectations are only part of what will decide the SLI. They must follow the new ALPA merger policy that includes longevity and "fairness".

I'm supposed to retire #160 at UAL. My whole career was slowed down by BK and the age 65 rule change. The only bright spot is when the retirements start and I finally get to enjoy some seniority. Now there are CAL pilots that think I should be placed behind a 2007 hire. The last time a large group of pilots lost that much seniority, USAir left the union. ALPA can't afford to have that happen again, and that's why they changed the merger policy to include longevity.

So....all you guys talking about "relative seniority" better take a look at the official merger policy. IT'S NOT IN THERE!!
Reply