Originally Posted by
routemap
I'm sure you know this, but "Factors that must be considered in constructing a fair and equitable integrated seniority list in no particular order and with no particular weight include but are not limited to: career expectations, longevity, status and category."
To fully expect the 1999 furloughs to NOT go behind the 2005-2007 CAL hires is a bold statement. Bottom line is furloughed is a bad place to be in a merger.
Anyway, glad you are not the on the arbitration board, you would put me back on reserve all because of longevity, longevity, longevity.
Has there ever been a seniority integration between two major carriers where one had furloughed pilots stapled to the bottom of the list? Which merger are you basing your comment on?