Originally Posted by
MatchPoint
Sure but you're jumping to an extreme when using an example of cutting flights from 10 to 1. Yes they want options but you can still give them options without running 10 RJ’s. Instead of 10 RJs you can use 4 - 737-700's (137 x 4 = 548 seats) or 3 737-700s plus 3 RJ's and still cover the route with good frequency. This is exactly what Delta has started to doing and their doing it with great success. Also the length of flight doesn't matter as much as you’d think (i.e. SWA with all their little hops). Delta will use the DC9 to fly from MSP to RST which is a 15 minute flight and they'll run the Airbus from MSP to FAR (45 minute flight). They run the larger equipment at peak times to increase seats when the majority of travelers actually travel and then supplement them with RJ's for those who aren't restricted by the work or school week. They reduced the frequency but not from 10 to 1 but 10 to 5 or 6. Does it work? Well just look at Delta’s financials.
Believe me, this is where we’re headed and it's a good thing.