Originally Posted by wiggy

I don't think it's "spin". They were all offered their jobs back, but elected to bypass. I thought the whole point was...they were placed on the ISSL as if they were "active", even though technically they weren't...they were for ISSL construction purposes only.

That goes back to the original point or question that SoCal guy asked: whether dal had furloughees who hadn't been offered recall at the time of the merger...If there had been, there is a possibility that they would have been treated differently on the ISSL. I think that was the point, wasn't it?