Originally Posted by
Mesabah
There are no set limits on the power the bankruptcy judge has other than the framework of section 1113, he can issue an opinion on anything. However the basis of a rejected contract is labor law and associated government rules and regulations. Just because one judge thinks the RLA is null and void, doesn't mean it is.
Which is exactly why "law" is such a slimy business. An opinion is just that. Even a judge's opinion or ruling is subject to reversal if pressed long and hard enough by someone with deep enough pockets to out-bleed the opponent. (If this weren't true, why is Roe v. Wade still being discussed?) My guess here though is that the creditors aren't interested in out-bleeding anybody, and they carry the load at this point in time.