View Single Post
Old 09-22-2012 | 11:32 AM
  #110807  
johnso29
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Originally Posted by flyallnite
I doubt you'd be any worse off at the bottom of UALs list. With bases in SFO, ORD, IAD, DEN... at least you'd have a shot at a decent QOL.

UAL has way more high paying heavies than we do, and 787s coming online today.

UAL is all set in the Pacific, with great partners, HND access, Air Mike... they are much stronger than we are in Latin America, and while not tops in the Atlantic, (in this economy, not a bad thing) they have the best partner- Lufthansa. Oh, and huge retirements coming up.

We have: MD90's, no widebody orders, hats, 717s, replacement 737s for 757's, Alaska continues to expand at our expense, DC9s... A tenuous position in Asia that could result in massive furloughs if we get shut out of HND, and big exposure in Europe with a financially strapped partner AF/KLM. A shiny name tag for all the world to google, triple airport reserve in NYC. We are a distant third in Latin America.

And frankly, our base choices are not exactly inspiring. If I were junior and young, I'd be jumping ship too. The contract pain is short term, the prospects are very bright.
UAL will also be replacing a ton of 757's with 737's. And Alaska is not expanding at our expense. Did the allowable percentage of codeshare passengers not decrease with the new contract? We too have huge retirements coming up. A WB order will likely be announced before the years end.

The UAL route network is better, but we knew it would be before they merged. The HND situation will work out. I have a lot of faith in RA. He is a VERY smart man, and he does NOT like to lose. UAL could work out better, but it may not.