Originally Posted by
intrepidcv11
Well aware of the differnce but in this case they do have something to do with each other. I said 'retro longevity' because they came back at year one pay scale. Therefore the retro they are owed goes way up if you credit 2.5 years to their longevity.
Ahh don't worry. ALPA is gonna bone us all on that troublesome little retro question!
Pay for longevity is forward looking while retro is a look back. If they don't currently have longevity credit, they haven't earned it yet. If they haven't earned it, retro by definition is not a factor.