View Single Post
Old 10-13-2012 | 01:38 PM
  #41  
ChrisJT6
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by fanaticalflyer
Anyone else that comments to the contrary with no support, needs to keep their pinhole shut. Datake is correct and his fears are substantiated. Also, the odds of furloughees getting full longevity is a super long shot. CAL MEC does NOT want it, for fear that it will affect their pilot group. Does't matter that pay longevity should have no effect on SLI longevity, but they don't get it. And you aren't going to convince them otherwise so it will go to arbitration and each MEC will argue their points then.
How dare I comment following your strict orders of silence...but oh well, here I go anyway:

From your CAL MEC VC to my "CAL New Hire" Class recently: "the CAL MEC's position has always been in support of full longevity for pay purposes for all UAL and CAL furloughees".

One of you is wrong...I also may be wrong but my guess is you aren't as in touch with your MEC as your bad self thinks and might want to heed your own advice on jabbering half cocked.
Reply