Actually "retro pay" is fantastically simple, and has a literal definition.
It only starts to get complicated, corrupted, and stupid when they call it something else. It will get criminal if the membership doesn't get to ratify by vote. Same Same the bond BS.

The only ones, ever, to defend to bond distribution, and those that came up with it, are amazingly enough, the ones that came up with it or the few that got a huge windfall.

If I get a vote, and I won't because I am furloughed, I would vote for pure retro pay. If they want to come up with a different option, as long as the membership ratifies it - so be it.

This means the TA needs to spell out the distribution, or if they decide to sort it out later, it needs to say, in the TA, that it will be voted on by the membership, not "at the discretion of the MEC". That is how we got scammed on the bond. The TA we voted on had this language.

But first we have to wait until they get to this game. Sounds like they are playing a game even stupider than this as a warm up.

BOHECA