Originally Posted by
Dave Fitzgerald
If the contract is turned down, the results won't necessarily depend on who gets elected, or how the economy is recovering.
It will be more dependant on the board and whether or not Jeff's job is in jeopardy. His job should be on the line for nonperformance, stock price, and investor confidence. Anyone up for some lack of synergy and a side of bonus?
Great points Dave. Also, since the one of the cornerstone sections leaked and confirmed to be true is well below industry leading then shouldn't that be enough to vote no. Unless MPG is 130 I can't see how these pay rates are acceptable. And add the fact that we are getting a measly signing bonus should be even more compelling.