Originally Posted by
APC225
I've heard that one (of many) Plan Bs is that if one MEC votes no and another votes yes, they can and may attempt to implement the contract with the yes group and continue a side negotiation with the no group just to keep things moving and provide the illusion of progress for the board and banks. Isn't this is what happened at DAL?
There you go 100% retro accomplished for one group. One side can keep $400 million all to themselves!

. This JP guy is good!