I understand his main point of getting this out to us to let us decide, "It is the voice of the pilot group that should make the decision" but many of his other statements sound eerily like the C'02 roadshows of "doom and disaster unless...."
Ninety percent? Are we children of a lesser god? Why isn't it 100% or 105%? If the contract is worth a billion in the first year and 600 million thereafter as he says then to take 90% is to hand this company a check, at the very outset of this contract, of 340 million, nearly equal to the signing lump sum (which is probably far below 50% of full retro). More funding our future on the backs of the pilots.
Last edited by APC225; 11-04-2012 at 05:01 AM.