Originally Posted by
Trip7
24 seats can easily mean the difference between profit and loss. The economics of the E190 support mainline wages, while the E170 does not. It's a conclusion that is widely accepted around the globe as there are no legacy carriers worldwide that fly the CRJ700 900 or E170 175.
Career stagnation? That is exactly what the age 65 ruling did.
...............
Last edited by Gunga Galunga; 11-21-2012 at 05:34 AM.
Reason: not worth it