IMO one of the biggest problems with LCAL 02 contract was “retained management right”. This basically stated that unless expressly forbidden by the CBA the company could do as they wished. So a while back I asked one of our CALAPLA lawyers to explain why we had this in our contract. The answer I was given was that “the court” assumes that the company has this right anyway. I then asked, “If so then why does it need to be in the contract? “ I did not get an answer to that question. Interesting that it is gone from this TA.
One of the several problems I have with this contract is the way it is written. I want a CBA that does not need an attorney to interpret it.
IMO The only fact I know for sure is we have spent a lot of money and time for something that is not the best we can get.
I am still voting NO.
To quote Sir Charles, " I may be wrong, but I don't think so."