I read what he said and I am disagreeing with what ualhvy said. I've used fact to outline my arguement in the form of contractual language rebuttal. He is using an obfuscated answer to a FAQ which didn't say it was wrong ... it says "it would be a mistake to use it a reason to turn down the TA."

If the UAL-MEC comes out and says the interpretation is flat out wrong ... then I'll concede. But the MEC won't because they can't while still useing the T&PA as a fear factor to get yes votes.