View Single Post
Old 11-27-2012, 09:47 PM
  #10  
horrido27
Banned
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Position: 756 Left Side
Posts: 1,629
Default

Wow.. how dense can you be?!
First of all, where are you getting this "112%" number. My Rep told me we hover between 114 to 118% percent?!
Problem is, I don't know what that includes and means. Does it include Total (UAL & CAL Single Aisle Flying vs RJ's), Partial (one side or the other), 37 seat turbo props? United's mainline to RJ Ratio? what?!

No matter how you slice it. This TA is concessionary. It allows for 90 seaters configured to 76 seaters. Currently there are none.
It allows for a carve out of 37 seaters.
It allows for an unknown amount of 50 to 66 seaters.

You say it curtails the potential growth of UAX significantly compared to current book. Who's book?
Cause for the Continental Pilot Group, this Scope Section with regards to RJ Flying is Concessionary.
And I'm not even going into the LOA that allows USAir to get a large share of Code Share Flying.

You're Voting YES.. keep trying to justify it. If this POS TA Passes, we'll see what you have to say in 2014, 2015 and 2016 with regards to Scope.

Then again, my gut feeling is you don't give a ****~

Motch
horrido27 is offline