Originally Posted by
SoCalGuy
The question that was asked earlier was/is extremely relevant. I actually asked what "Equipment/Seat", but I'll take the info that you provided above.
After reading several of your posts, I became interested as to "where you sat" by way of your espoused facts/laced opinions, thus the question that I posed to further the 'big picture'. To veil behind your statement in saying that you, "fail to see the relevance", says a lot.
All Pilots (who are in good standing) are afforded the opportunity to vote on the current/proposed TA. It's extremely poignant that all voting Pilots conduct their own due diligence as to "where" someone's opinions/views matriculate surround the agreement, ie - your various post's/opinions on the topic vs your Equip/Seat. I'm sure with any type of law background, you would appreciate/understand that examination.....Thus the relevance of the information asked above after reading your thought's.
I'm sure I was not the only one who was 'wondering' the above mentioned "facts" while digesting your writings.
Thanks for the information, and I appreciate the candor.
Okay, that is fair. As you can imagine, my opinions aren't very popular with the "NO at all cost" crowd so I was a little defensive.
For the record:
-UAL, never furloughed
-A320 F/O by choice
-Multiple airlines
-Never held any position with ALPA
-Business degrees and background
-No law degree but I have many, many years negotiating complex business agreements, JV partnerships, etc. in another industry
-Opinions expressed are wholly my own
None of my posts constitutes legal advice, an offer or recommendation to purchase marketable securities, or tax advice. Please read the prospectus carefully before voting.