Originally Posted by
nbecca
It's not called "the LOA 67 lawsuit." LOA 67 is not at issue in any current litigation and I'm not referring to that situation.
Educate yourself, it's not my job.
Here's a link to a pitiful request from someone asking IBT to stop the "LOA 67 lawsuit".
Petition FRONTIER AIRLINE PILOTS BARGAINING REPRESENTATIVE; PLEASE DROP LOA 67 LAWSUIT!
Also here are some quotes from "Civil Action No. 11-cv-02007-MSK-KLM INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS,
AIRLINE DIVISION
v.
Plaintiff,
FRONTIER AIRLINES, INC.,
REPUBLIC AIRWAYS HOLDINGS, INC., and FAPAInvest, LLC,"
This is taken from PAGE 1 of the IBT motion to for summary judgement in 1:11-cv-02007-MSK-KLM:
"IBT requests that the Court invalidate the following six (6) agreements: (1) June 24, 2011 Letter of Agreement 67 (“LOA 67”) entered into by defendant Frontier Airlines, Inc. (“Frontier”) and the Frontier Airlines Pilots Association (“FAPA”) (# 80- 4);..."
I guess Nbecca, you need to educate me on how LOA 67 is not a matter in any pending litigation. Regardless of whether you think LOA 67 should be invalidated, you can't argue that it isn't a factor in any pending litigation that is unless you are an RAH manager, in which case carry on. I don't want to waste my time with you.
And, I am familiar with one other instance where information was said to have been released early but I haven't seen any definitive data.