Originally Posted by
sailingfun
Your point is valid going forward. By the time the process runs its course the company will have had 4 plus years of non compliance. You can not impose retroactive flying. There has to be a penalty to the company for that time period.
If we can get the new contract rammed through in record time via "constructive engagement," why should it take 4 years to end their contract non-compliance?
Is the "constructive engagement" less of a two-way street than it appears? Only when it suits them?
That being said I agree that compensation for the period of grievance is needed
in addition to the ending of the non-compliance/violation. Compensation in exchange for allowing them to continue the violation with our agreement is the no-no.