View Single Post
Old 12-17-2012 | 07:42 PM
  #22  
FLMD11CAPT's Avatar
FLMD11CAPT
Ok, No more sleeping Dog
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 889
Likes: 0
From: MD-11, F/O
Question

Originally Posted by AFW_MD11
exactly my point.

FLMD11CAPT - yes - illogical - you need to read & understand the CBA - your comments (illogical scenarios) indicate that you haven't read the CBA and/or don't understand the process at all.
Read it.....even contributed some of it. I do agree with above posts that this will eventually be voted on along with the rest of the proposed TA, but by that time all the heavy lifting will have been done by the NC at the table and our vote will be on the best pakage TA they could procure. Part of that will be "Deadheading". My point here is simply that our current position and leverage there is fairly strong given the egregious evidence we can present on the Co playing it fast and loose with accepted fares, class of service, Check- ins and deviations. Giving the Co any advantage in bargaining position by voluntarily using Co dh's in lieu of scheduled ones gives them a documented argument that we "like" that , which is difficult for the NC to refute since WE DO IT. Thus some of the well needed improvements in the DH section can be diluted by the Co. With their demand of more DHing on Co AC. Nes' Pa?
Reply