Originally Posted by
shiznit
I'm in agreement that should be all about numbers and not politics.... However we live in a world where people don't always think the same way we do, and thus undertake paths that you or I might not choose. There are pluses and minuses to methods, I prefer the slower and deliberate method to be employed more often than we have seen, but I also recognize that there are times when the Reps have elected a team they trust to "execute" the direction of the MEC, they put the team in place, let them do their job, and not necessarily call a meeting to vote on everything that comes along.
I'm with you completely on the dissemination of info in these types of matters. I'd love to see the TAJV "scope report card" just like most everyone here, but I'm not going start complaining when I just got a good quality update on another section of the scope clause.
george: "...but that information doesnt seem to be forthcoming..."
I should have merely said: How do you know? It has only been 3 days since the new Chairman took office.
Does that work Sink?
Indeed, that would have worked better. I don't think George was complaining about a specific administration, and he didn't tie it to the change. I don't think many of us actually
care about the make-up of administrations, only the results.
Results, of course, are driven by strategy and tactics. I didn't get the impression George was asking for impatient, hot-headed moves. I'm not going to speak for him, but deliberate is always fine with me. You can, of course, be deliberate and not be slow.