Originally Posted by
Bucking Bar
No.
It is just a natural characteristic of highly autocratic power structures to ignore the rules when the rules don't suit them.
In the past I have defended our union's mechanisms to resolve conflicts of interest internally. Now I am defending our Constitution and Bylaws with the hope we can resolve our problems and avoid handing a winning platform to ALPA's enemies.
This is bringing back memories of the 'ole, we can't challenge RAH buying Frontier as a scope violation because it's a "subsidiary" again. It does seem as though scope is only defendable when a very narrow set of conditions is met.
