Originally Posted by
Fly4hire
Word I got from my reps, who I actually spoke with, is while there are concerns, the MEC has not yet been briefed and it is still under review. Wholly owned, announced just yesterday may have other considerations. I think today's code-a-phone covered it and said its still under review.
I'd rather have the correct answer than the wrong one fast, and if someone's interpretation disagrees with yours doesn't mean it's a cover up, conflict of interest or conspiracy.
.
In general, I agree that one should wait to see where the dust settles before making a judgement on whether "the system" works.
However, as a backdrop, in the case of ALPA, with the RAH scope violation that "wasn't" a scope violation that later became a contract carveout exemption, I don't trust "the system."
If the correct answer of which you speak comes out to be "Yeah, sure, Delta doesn't have to include DALPA when they impact DALPA scope"...and ALPA is good with that...
What say you then? Are you good with that?