Originally Posted by scambo1

In general, I agree that one should wait to see where the dust settles before making a judgement on whether "the system" works.

However, as a backdrop, in the case of ALPA, with the RAH scope violation that "wasn't" a scope violation that later became a contract carveout exemption, I don't trust "the system."

If the correct answer of which you speak comes out to be "Yeah, sure, Delta doesn't have to include DALPA when they impact DALPA scope"...and ALPA is good with that...

What say you then? Are you good with that?