WD you speak as if stating FACT....Who or what are you quoting?? AOL might I guess?? The 9th places the burden of proof on the west pilot group, that harm has in fact been done.. IF THE NIC WERE FINAL AND BINDING, THE 9TH WOULD MANDATE ITS USE AND NOT REQUIRE PROOF OF DAMAGE!!! CAPICHE????
They stated that a Nic inclusive CBA might be UN-RATIFIABLE!!!
Going as far as saying that "not employing the Nic might in fact not harm the plaintiffs"!!!
ps. "emergency injunction"??? Is that like an emergency AD??
Last edited by LittleBoyBlew; 01-09-2013 at 12:03 PM.