Originally Posted by
Phantom Flyer
I think Boeing shot themselves in the foot when they went to a "save weight at all costs" design philosophy, at least in the electrical system batteries. The decision to switch from a proven, albeit heavier, ni-cad battery to the lithium-ion batteries may prove to be very expensive with possible cancelled or lost orders or certainly significant performance penalties paid.
Why jump two generations of battery back when one will do?
Absolutely no reason to entertain NiCad batteries when NiMH will do.
Besides, most (no-mechanical) Li-Ion hazards are related to the charging circuits and not the battery itself (knowing its limitations).
Why would anyone consider NiCad over NiMH ,,, in any environment?