Originally Posted by
APC225
UAL MEC: 12 Yes, 3 No, including LOA 25. The UAL MEC could easily have manipulated the SLI process by giving signing bonus money to their furloughs as if they were on the property to prove their sincerity to the arbitrators that they really consider them to be so. They did not.
That's one theory. Another theory is that the merger SLI will be based on May 2010 and therefore will not be influended by LOA 25 or the "signing bonus money" (which is retro-pay money on the UAL side).
Sled