Thread: UAL Fleet Plan
View Single Post
Old 01-28-2013, 03:58 AM
  #15  
SoCalGuy
Keep Calm Chive ON
 
SoCalGuy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Boeing's Plastic Jet Button Pusher - 787
Posts: 2,086
Default

Originally Posted by UAL T38 Phlyer View Post
I'm going with 90 days. Boeing will push for 30, the FAA will want 120; compromise will be 90.

Outcome will be a new type of Lithium battery (less subject to impact damage/thermal runaway), an improved (and heavier) containment system, some type of fire-extinguishing capability that routes directly into said containment system, and supporting peripheral equipment (charging/monitoring, etc).

There will be a lawsuit from the airlines asking for damages from lost revenue. It will take three years, and be settled out of court for an undisclosed amount.

Boeing stock will dip until the new system is certified, the aircraft get back in the air, and no fires happen for a week or two.

Remember: technically, a nightmare is still a dream.........liner.
I hope your 'in the ballpark' for Boeing's sake, as well as the Company's.

Let's just hope one guy's opinion, out of MIT, does not come to fruition as he plays his own round of "Nostradamus".

MIT Professor: Battery Fix Could Ground 787 Until 2014 - Forbes
SoCalGuy is offline